<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: The Tanglewood TSR-2 Acoustic Guitar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sharemyguitar.com/review-the-tanglewood-tsr-2-acoustic-guitar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sharemyguitar.com/review-the-tanglewood-tsr-2-acoustic-guitar/</link>
	<description>Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Coplan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharemyguitar.com/review-the-tanglewood-tsr-2-acoustic-guitar/comment-page-1/#comment-1965</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Coplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharemyguitar.com/blog/?p=4663#comment-1965</guid>
		<description>This is a fairly balanced guitar, but the emphasis is on the upper mid registers with some brighter treble adding clarity, without being too bright. There&#039;s definitely fuller body to the tone but my impression is that this is something that will definitely fill out and warm up with time.

I can&#039;t comment on how the bridge shape affects the sound because I don&#039;t have anything to fairly compare it to. As for the saddle, it&#039;s not split or compensated - it&#039;s straight all the way across.

It is punchier than dreadnaughts I&#039;ve played and this is likely attributed to the narrow waist. My feeling is that the mid range emphasis does help it project more than a fuller/wider guitar that promotes more of a bottom end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fairly balanced guitar, but the emphasis is on the upper mid registers with some brighter treble adding clarity, without being too bright. There&#8217;s definitely fuller body to the tone but my impression is that this is something that will definitely fill out and warm up with time.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t comment on how the bridge shape affects the sound because I don&#8217;t have anything to fairly compare it to. As for the saddle, it&#8217;s not split or compensated &#8211; it&#8217;s straight all the way across.</p>
<p>It is punchier than dreadnaughts I&#8217;ve played and this is likely attributed to the narrow waist. My feeling is that the mid range emphasis does help it project more than a fuller/wider guitar that promotes more of a bottom end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stratoblogster</title>
		<link>http://blog.sharemyguitar.com/review-the-tanglewood-tsr-2-acoustic-guitar/comment-page-1/#comment-1962</link>
		<dc:creator>Stratoblogster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharemyguitar.com/blog/?p=4663#comment-1962</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the midrange like? Does that bridge shape, and split saddle help to curb the boominess of models in this size category?? Do the mids punch out and project better than a typical dread or grand auditorium??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the midrange like? Does that bridge shape, and split saddle help to curb the boominess of models in this size category?? Do the mids punch out and project better than a typical dread or grand auditorium??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

